Helen Suzman Foundation Legally Challenges Zuma’s Parole

Former President Jacob Zuma/ Photo File: eNCA

The Helen Suzman Foundation has grow to be the most recent entity to file a authorized problem to former President Jacob Zuma’s medical parole, claiming it was unconstitutionally granted.

Francis Antonie, a director on the basis, stated in courtroom papers filed with the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria on Tuesday that the September 5 parole was unlawful as a result of the nation’s prisons boss, Arthur Fraser, misinterpreted the act he relied on to overrule the parole board, which had stated Zuma was in a steady situation.

READ MORE: Spouse Petrol Bombs Gauteng Mom In Her Car Outside Daughter’s Pre-School

In his affidavit on behalf of the inspiration, Antonie requests that the excessive courtroom rule on the matter as quickly as doable as a result of any delays would hurt the rule of regulation and profit Zuma unduly.

Among these cited within the papers are Fraser and Zuma himself. “First, delaying this review until a hearing in the ordinary course risks irreparable harm to the rule of law. The Constitutional Court sentenced Mr Zuma to 15 months’ imprisonment, as the necessary sentence to defend our constitutional democracy, the rule of law, and the administration of justice,” Antonie stated.

READ MORE: Embattled Ace Magashule Loses Another Court Battle

Zuma was out of the Estcourt jail on the time of his launch after the navy well being providers whisked him to Pretoria to be handled for an undisclosed ailment. Antonie asks the courtroom to overturn Fraser’s determination and forestall Zuma from benefiting from the ten days granted to him by parole.

“The HSF can even argue that within the train of its simply and equitable energy, the Court ought to grant reduction guaranteeing that Mr Zuma doesn’t unduly profit from the hiatus in his jail time and that the total 15 months sentence is served.

“To the extent that any future medical parole determination is to be taken, that will solely happen inside the prescripts of the regulation as articulated by this Court in its judgment.

Back to top button